Vladimir Ulyanov and Nikolai Lenin are different persons

Issuance of claims and filing of criminal cases due to the facts of history
falsification is possible, as long as such facts.
From the legal point of view, the knowledge of history was formerly a
SPECIAL knowledge possessed by the few. But now, as the Internet
continues its growth, this history knowledge became GENERAL.
Discrepancies between the general knowledge and official interpretation
make the society believe that the power is occupational. But the
official interpretation must be aligned with the general knowledge.

After cancellation of Article 6 of the Constitution (The party supervises over all), everything
written by the historians is written at their own risk. The Ministry of
Education and Science renders educational services, so a possibility of
issuing claims against the Ministry and educational institutions under
the Law No. 234-FZ "On Protection of the Rights of Consumers".

When spending state money to buy textbooks that describe a
forged history, an amount exceeding 1 million rubles means causing
severe damage, requiring action under the corresponding Penal Code
articles against the involved officials....

Research conclusion: on February 23rd, 1917, Russia was seized by
the USA with the help of Jewish OCGs (The organised criminal groups).


One cannot claim the participation of Jews as a nation, because,
firstly, this is expression of extremism, and secondly, there was a lot
of Jews among the numerous thousands and millions of Bolsheviks victims.


Below are some extracts from significant New York Times articles.

Lev Bronstein (Trotsky) published his opinion concerning the future
course of the revolution in Russia. On March, 16th, after probably
coercive removal of the tsar (no objective data on renunciation is
available), Lev Trotsky's interview was published in the "New World" (NY
USA):

"... the committee which has taken the place of the deposed Ministry
in Russia did not represent the interests or the aims of the
revolutionists, that it would probably be short lived, and step down in
favor of men who would be more sure o carry forward the democratization
of Russia." [March 16th, 1917, New York Times].


Starting to provide open military and other assistance to Bolsheviks:

"WASHINGTON, June 28.-Plans of the American Government for aiding
Russia in rehabilitating herself, which became known today, reveal that
the first step contemplated is informal assistance through American
business and Industrial leaders, and dispose of widely published reports
that a diplomatic or political mission would be the means of carrying
out President Wilson's promise to stand back of Russia.

The personnel of a group of men who will carry expert advice and
material aid along with America's expression of disinterested friendship
to the Russian people now is being discussed. They will include only
men familiar with Russian economic and transportation conditions.

Ample police protection is expected to be afforded them, but all
show of mili tary force will be avoided. Officials were reluctant to
discuss this phase of the situation, realizing that Germany would seize
upon it as a means of dls tor ting the intentions of the United States.
For that reason it is likely that full details of the assistance to be
proffered will not be disclosed until after the Germans learn of them by
finding the plans actually In effect…."[June 29th, 1918, New York
Times].


Together with Trotsky, and also in 1920, Nikolai Lenin acts on the
scene. Only in 1920 the public discovered that Lenin is Vladimir Ilich
(Lenin). One of such publications is dated November 7th, 1920, and is
called "Gorky to Lenin".

Statements claiming that Nikolai Lenin was "a German spy" appear
constantly. However, according to Antony Sutton, a representative of the
American Red Cross mission (Root's mission) Boris Reinstein was the
Lenin's secretary. He worked as an interpreter for a group of USA army
officers. Information studies have shown that a grandson of the Lenin's
secretary today is a USA federal judge, responsible for handling appeals
connected with criminal cases [4].

Now we have all reasons to ask whether Nikolai Lenin and Vladimir
Ulyanov is the same person, according to the official history, or not?
The names are different, and no proofs have been presented to the
society.

To answer the question, we will use our special knowledge in the
field of the forensic expertise and special criminalistic techniques.



The result of comparative analysis shows that a distinction within
the same characteristic is present, e.g. the asymmetry is different.
This categorically means that Nikolai Lenin of 1917 and Vladimir Ulyanov
are different persons.



Article conclusions:


Vladimir Ulyanov and Nikolaj Lenin are different persons.


Issuance of claims and filing of criminal cases due to the facts of
history falsification is possible, as long as such facts do exist.
Popular article for history: http://www.cneat.ru/lenin.html





Anton Kolmykov. Legal Responsibility for History Falsification.
Revolution of 1917 in Russia./ Monthly scientific magazine "Discussion",
3, Yekaterinburg, March 2010, page 8-11. ISSN 2077-7639; ISBN
978-5-91256; UDC code: 94; 34.096.



The scientific article on stories (en):


http://www.publicant.ru/book.aspx?idd=949678



In 1924 under V.I.Lenin's name other person is buried.


The expert's statement № 180 from 12.06.2010г. Forensic examination Samara - CNEAT.


http://scipeople.ru/uploads/materials/10175/zak-lenin.pdf